A Word On Winfrey Point

May 09, 2012 5 Comments by

While it appears that the controversy concerning overflow parking for the Dallas Arboretum at Winfrey Point may be resolved for the time being, we received a letter from District 3 Park Board Member Michael Reagan and wanted to pass along his thoughts on the issue. It’s great to have neighbors like Michael who volunteer their time for positions like this who are also willing to keep us informed. Thanks, Michael!

- -

A lot of people are very unhappy with what they believe is happening at Winfrey Point, and as a Park Board Member, representing District 3, I have information that I would like to share in an attempt to clarify information that has been either misreported, misrepresented or misunderstood. In addition, both the Arboretum and the City of Dallas have made press releases that are very informative.

The ever growing popularity of White Rock Lake and the Dallas Arboretum have caused parking issues in the area, largely on the East side of the lake. Visitors sometimes park in the neighborhoods around the lake, creating inconvenience for some of the neighboring residents. The Arboretum and the City of Dallas have explored many options for alleviating these parking issues, and many proposals have been made. The Arboretum itself has done, what I personally believe to be a very good job of arranging for off-site parking and using shuttles to address their parking issues directly.

What was presented to, and approved by, the Park and Recreation Board was a proposal to allow temporary, unimproved parking, up to 400 spaces, at Winfrey Point as needed due to demand resulting from the Chihuly exhibit and eventually the new children’s garden currently under construction. This move was intended to ameliorate the local resident issues and provide an orderly and strategic means of dealing with the parking issues in the area.

I have seen a number of very beautiful images taken from the building at Winfrey Point, looking toward the lake, exhibiting the lovely terrain and flora that exist there. Parking in this area has neither been proposed or approved. The approved temporary parking area is off of Emerald Isle, and will in no way impact the vista that has been so popularly represented on Social Media sites like Facebook. In addition, the parking areas will not be paved. This has neither been proposed or approved.

There has been a lot of talk about a parking garage. This was a concept provided by a consulting firm to the Arboretum, along with a number of other concepts. No proposal for a parking garage at Winfrey Point has been presented to, or approved in any way, by the Park & Recreation Board. There are currently 3 baseball diamonds and an existing parking lot on the site where the parking lot concept was drawn. The little leagues that play on those diamonds have multiple years left on their agreement, and the activity at those diamonds has been healthy and generally well-received. In addition, the city has invested significant money toward the construction and maintenance of those diamonds, and there is no movement to remove them for additional parking.

Lastly, a great deal has been said about the importance of the “blackland prairie” that allegedly exists at Winfrey Point. I have heard multiple conflicting reports about this, and am admittedly not an expert myself. What I can say with certainty is this: the area in question currently gets mowed twice a year as fire prevention control. Even if there had never been any approval to create temporary parking, this area would be mowed twice a year. The same area used to be mowed even more often (and I’ve been told that a number of neighborhood residents complained then that it wasn’t mowed frequently enough), and the Park & Recreation Department planted some grasses, plus Wildflowers in this area (and many others around the city) in order to reduce their mowing expenses as an overall cost-saving strategy. I have also been told informally that the area in question has been used for parking in the past, and anecdotally, my own Mother and Father told me over dinner last night that as teenagers and young adults, they used to park on Winfrey Point all the time. I made a conscious decision to not ask them why however.

Best regards to everyone who took the time to read this, and please feel free to ask me any questions you have, or express any ongoing concerns, if you are able to do so in a respectful way.

Sincerely,

Michael Reagan
District 3 Park Board Member

 

News

About the author

Rob has lived in North Oak Cliff for 7 years and has eaten at nearly every taco stand in the area during that time. He also was a founder of CliffDweller Magazine and has served on the boards of the Oak Cliff Chamber of Commerce and the Texas Theatre.

5 Responses to “A Word On Winfrey Point”

  1. Ellie says:

    Well, the real issue is lack of public transportation to the area. Until this is resolved, the growing popularity of a specific place in Dallas will always be a problem to confront instead of a great thing to welcome.

  2. Brian Shivers says:

    Rob:

    I also want to thank Michael for putting the facts out. The early coverage of this issue was as he said: “misreported , misrepresented, and misunderstood.” One thing I’d like to correct, though, is where the parking garage drawing came from. It was done for the Park Dept. last year. The staff didn’t want to pursue it and never presented it to the Park Board. Nobody at the Arboretum even knew it existed until the protestors put it on the web.

    Thanks,

    Brian Shivers
    DABS Chairman

  3. Chris Herron says:

    I would like to thank the Park Board member for expressing his concerns about parking at Winfrey Point. Unfortunately, he seems to be missing the point. Winfrey Point, even the site of the proposed parking, is beautiful and natural. It is free to use and enjoyed by thousands of people each year. The Arboretum and City did state that parking was a problem at Winfrey Point and vehicles park in the surrounding neighborhoods during events. Certainly during the handful of events each year (10-15) that are hosted at Winfrey, parking can be an issue. But this is temporary and with better traffic management utilizing DART and the existing off site parking this can be managed effectively. Being one of those neighbors, in a neighborhood that supposedly has issues with traffic from Winfrey Point events, I can say that neither the Park Board or Arboretum have ever approached us to discuss if we have a problem with Winfrey Point traffic. The point, is, and this is the point Mr. Reagan seems to be missing is that Winfrey Point is a FREE resource for all of Dallas to use. Putting in either temporary or permanent parking will take this resource away and give it to a private institution. It costs a family of 4 at least $60 to visit the Arboretum. It costs nothing to visit Winfrey Point. Why would we take this away when other viable parking options exist? It makes no difference whether or not people parked at Winfrey Point in the past and it makes no difference whether it is Blackland Prairie or not. What matters is that right now, it is a beautiful, natural area freely enjoyed by the masses. We have more than 8,000 petition signatures from people who agree with this. Look for their comments to be posted soon.

  4. Chris Herron says:

    I would also suggest reading this post from the Observer. It makes some salient points:

    http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2012/05/winfrey_point_fallout_shows_ci.php

  5. White Rock Lake says:

    The fight over Winfrey Point is far from over. The latest documents discovered by Hal Barker leave a bad taste in our mouths, and reminds us of Mao Zedong’s slogan: “Man must conquer Nature.” Read the latest here, and browse the new documentation just released: http://white-rock-lake.blogspot.com/2012/05/winfrey-point-new-documentation-reveals.html

Leave a Reply